Philly’s soda tax

Philadelphia Council President: ‘Divisive’ 3-cents soda tax isn’t happening

In a candid commentary, Darrell Clarke said Mayor Jim Kenney’s signature revenue proposal will not fly in its current form.

City Council

Update 5:20 p.m. 

Philadelphia City Council President Darrell Clarke says it’s time to come up with a new solution to fund pre-K — one that isn’t Mayor Jim Kenney’s three-cents-per-ounce soda tax plan.

“This has been one of the most divisive proposals since I’ve been here,” Clarke said during a budget hearing Wednesday, adding: “Everybody on this side of the table knows it’s not going to be a three-cents-per-ounce-tax.”

While most of Council agrees expanding pre-K offerings in the city is a good idea, they’re split over how to fund it. Kenney’s administration wants a three-cents-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks. Some Council members might support that at a one or two-cents rate. Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown introduced a 15-cent tax on drink containers that would cover all drinks except baby formula and milk products.

Clarke spokeswoman Jane Roh said Clarke doesn’t question the need for universal pre-K but would like to see a plan by the administration to prioritize a program for lower income families.

“If I have a kid in pre-K,” Clarke said during the hearing, “I don’t think the taxpayers should pay for that. I think I should pay for that.”

Councilman Curtis Jones, Jr., who’s in favor of Kenney’s proposal, responded to Clarke, saying he believes all children deserve access to pre-K, even if their parents can’t afford it.

No matter what Council decides to approve in terms of funding a pre-K program (and community schools… and an ailing pension fund…), Clarke’s right: This has been a divisive conversation. Clarke said it’s no secret a sugary drinks tax is regressive and will almost undoubtedly impact lower-income communities.

And in a public conversation with Kenney’s Deputy Mayor for Policy and Legislation Jim Engler during the hearing today, Clarke took the administration to task for not seriously considering other options for funding its priorities.

“I would ask the administration to think a little more seriously about a broader-based revenue stream,” he said. “We have to go after some kind of broader-based strategy than just taxing poor people.”

Kenney’s administration has contended that though soda consumption is higher among the poor, the sugary drinks tax is not “a tax on the poor.” Administration spokeswoman Lauren Hitt pointed to a study which found low-income consumers are more likely to avoid the tax altogether.

Want some more? Explore other Philly’s soda tax stories.

Thanks for reading all the way

Seems you’re the kind of person who really digs in. Want more? Get an update direct to your inbox each morning, with everything you need to stay on top of Philly news.

Billy Penn runs on reader support

Like the story above, everything we publish is powered by people like you. If our work helps you learn about and enjoy Philadelphia, we’d love to count you as a member.

What’s the good word?

Our quick morning newsletter packed with info and events exists thanks to your support. Know someone who might enjoy it?

Send them an invite to subscribe now.

Spread the love

Billy Penn members like you are the reason our newsroom keeps going. Know someone who might want to support our work? Send them a note — they just might join the local journalism fight.